Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi - History, Government, Language, and Sources

Download PDF creates a visual, rasterized copy. Use Print for selectable text and better assistive-technology support.

Deep History of the Caucasus: Highlands, Lowlands, and Connected Worlds
Western Georgia, Colchian lowlands, and eastern Black Sea hinterland · Source-reviewed profile

Lazica/Egrisi and Nokalakevi

Egrisi / ეგრისი; Nokalakevi / ნოქალაქევი

Fortifications, churches, palatial and domestic buildings, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, and surrounding settlement evidence illuminate a western Georgian kingdom within Roman-Sasanian competition and local networks.

Late-antique kingdom, fortified city, household, religious, military, and imperial-encounter context Approximately fourth-seventh centuries CE for principal Lazica/Egrisi phases, within a longer site sequence Fortifications, urban excavation, domestic and elite architecture, churches, baths, ceramics, coins, burials, landscape survey, and attributed Byzantine, Persian, and Georgian texts Nokalakevi archaeological site; a major fortified center and probable Archaeopolis, not the center of every Lazican community or a modern boundary
Overview

Evidence, landscapes, community scale, political organization, and connections

Mountain, river, Black Sea, Caspian, Anatolian, Iranian, and steppe connections

Rivers, fertile lowlands, forests, roads, mountain approaches, Black Sea connections, forts, farms, and churches supported regional power and everyday life.

Political organization and community scale

Kings, courts, local elites, fortified centers, churches, rural communities, soldiers, and Roman and Sasanian interests shaped changing authority and obligations.

Late-antique transformation, living heritage, and modern reception

Georgian institutions and international partners steward Nokalakevi. Lazica/Egrisi history cannot adjudicate present borders, ethnic identity, or personal ancestry.

Probable historical identification Archaeopolis

The identification is strong but should remain an evidence-based attribution rather than a timeless name.

Current research [S1] [S2]
Political setting Lazica/Egrisi amid Roman-Sasanian competition

Local rulers and communities had agency within imperial conflict.

Sixth-century context [S1] [S3]
Representativeness one fortified center, not the entire kingdom

Rural, coastal, and mountain communities require additional evidence.

Reviewed 2026 [S2] [S3]
Historical sequence

A concise, sourced timeline

These milestones are orientation points, not a complete history.

  1. Fortified urban center develops

    Walls, buildings, churches, households, and routes supported local and royal institutions in western Georgia.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]

  2. Lazic War reshapes the region

    Eastern Roman and Sasanian forces competed through alliances, siege, movement, coercion, and local political choices.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]

  3. Religious and political institutions transform

    Churches, fortifications, settlement, and imperial relations changed unevenly without simple population replacement.

    [S1] [S2]

  4. Anglo-Georgian project expands research

    Stratigraphic excavation, survey, conservation, training, and publication refined the site's long chronology.

    [S1] [S2] [S3]
Culture and language

Households, subsistence, labor, language, belief, craft, exchange, and mobility

Languages named in this profile

  • Kartvelian languages in regional historical context
  • Greek in eastern Roman institutional and ecclesiastical use
  • Middle Persian and other languages in imperial encounters

Language family: Kartvelian language history is relevant, but texts and material culture cannot assign every subject one identity

Long-running fieldwork integrates city, household, burial, and landscape evidence.

Fortifications reveal labor and conflict but not a complete social history.

The Lazic War must be read through partisan imperial authors and local archaeology.

Elite graves, fortresses, royal inscriptions, churches, palaces, imported objects, and state heritage narratives are often more visible than households, women, children, farmers, herders, fishers, craftspeople, migrants, captives, enslaved or coerced people, and rural communities. Evidence gaps must not be filled with evolutionary hierarchy, ethnic purity, foreign-founder, empty-land, lost-civilization, or simple population-replacement narratives.

AI research guide

Ask about this reviewed profile

The guide can explain and connect facts already present on this page. It cannot search the open web, establish identity or citizenship, or evaluate ancestry and genetic information.

Grounded in approved profile content Citations use the source IDs below No account or DNA context

Before you continue: the analysis you are about to generate is produced by an AI model. AI output can be incomplete, inaccurate, or simply wrong. It describes statistical genetic similarity to reference populations and is not proof of ancestry, ethnicity, identity, or descent. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and is not medical, diagnostic, genealogical, legal, or other professional advice. Do not rely on it to make health, financial, legal, or family decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, DNA Genics, S.L. accepts no liability for any loss or decision arising from your use of this AI output.

Do not enter names, contact details, family-tree information, account or kit identifiers, or genetic data.

Evidence register

Sources used for this page

Prefer Armenian, Azerbaijani, Georgian, and other relevant national and regional heritage institutions, living-community institutions, accountable archaeological missions, peer-reviewed projects, and UNESCO records. Register inscriptions and ancient or later texts with date, genre, language, audience, and viewpoint. Do not register Wikipedia or add rock-art, cave, sacred-site, burial, artifact, or human-remains imagery without per-file licensing, attribution, access-policy, community consideration, and ethical review.

  1. C1

    Dmanisi Hominid Archaeological Site

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2007; current tentative-list record

  2. C2

    Gobustan Rock Art Cultural Landscape

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological heritage record · 2007; current record

  3. C3

    The Culture of Shengavit

    History Museum of Armenia · National archaeological museum resource · Current museum research resource

  4. C4

    Areni-1 Cave

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · State-submitted archaeological heritage record · 2026; current tentative-list record

  5. C5

    Archaeological Collection

    History Museum of Armenia · National museum archaeological collections resource · Current institutional resource

  6. C6

    Historical Monuments of Mtskheta

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International cultural-heritage record · 1994; current record

  7. C7

    Vani Archaeological Museum

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum and site resource · Current museum resource

  8. C8

    Department of Ancient Archaeology

    Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  9. C9

    Citadel, Ancient City and Fortress Buildings of Derbent

    UNESCO World Heritage Centre · International archaeological and architectural heritage record · 2003; current record

  10. C10

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current archaeological project resource

  11. C11

    Ancient Archaeology Department

    Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · National academic archaeological research resource · Current research resource

  12. C12

    Museum Reserve Erebuni

    Yerevan Municipality · Public archaeological museum resource · Current municipal museum directory

  13. S1

    Nokalakevi Archaeological Project

    Anglo-Georgian Expedition to Nokalakevi · Accountable archaeological fieldwork and publication resource · Current project resource

  14. S2

    Nokalakevi Museum-Reserve and archaeological collections

    Georgian National Museum · National archaeological museum resource · Current institutional resource

  15. S3

    Late antique archaeology in Georgia

    University of Cambridge Department of Archaeology · University archaeological research resource · Current university research directory

Sources and names remain the property of their respective publishers and communities. Their inclusion is for citation and education; it does not imply endorsement of DNAGENICS. Summaries are original editorial paraphrases and should be checked against the linked source for important use.

Editorial review: August 5, 2026

Optional DNA report

Explore the separate paid DNA report for a personal genetic-similarity comparison designed for customers who want analysis beyond this educational atlas.

The Historical Atlas is free and uses no DNA or genetic data. The paid report is a separate genetic-similarity product, and this atlas cannot establish ethnicity, nationality, identity, ancestry, descent, recognition, sovereignty, territory, or community membership.
View the report
Continue exploring
Eastern Black Sea coast and Chorokhi corridor Apsaros/Gonio and Black Sea frontier communities Apsaros / Gonio / გონიო Read profile Arpa River valley and southern Armenian Highlands Areni-1 Chalcolithic cave communities Areni-1 / Արենի-1 քարանձավ Read profile Ararat Plain and Armenian Highlands Artaxiad Armenia and Artashat Artashat / Արտաշատ; Artaxiad Armenia Read profile
Use code for 35% off • Expires Sep 16